I was asked at the weekend what my favourite period of
Beatles music was. In truth that is an almost impossible question to answer, or
at least a question that is impossible to provide a consistent answer to. My answer will vary almost day to day
depending on what kind of mood I’m in at the time and what album I’ve most recently
listened to.
If it is almost
impossible to pin point a period in the development of The Beatles as my
favourite then it is actually
impossible to provide an answer to the equally oft asked question; who is my
favourite Beatle.
The chemistry that existed between the four of them was what
made The Beatles so special. It may, initially, have been John’s band, growing as
it did from the skiffle days of the Quarrymen, and the song writing partnership
he had with Paul was nothing short of musical alchemy, but to dismiss the
massive contributions of George and Ringo is to make a big mistake.
That was the unspoken, but clear all the same, assessment of
Philip Norman’s ‘Shout’, which is considered by many as being the definitive
book on The Beatles.
It was then with more than a hint of trepidation that I recently
purchased a copy of Norman’s biography of Lennon, ‘John Lennon – The Life’.
In ‘Shout’ Norman’s preference for John, no need to ask him
who his favourite Beatle is, came through on almost every page. It was inevitable, therefore, that he would
deal with the subject of John Lennon in more detail at some point.
And detail is one thing that this entertaining book of over
800 pages doesn’t lack.
The problem is in where that detail lies, or perhaps more
accurately, where it doesn’t.
Much of the detail provided on John’s formative years any
Beatle fan is likely to have read elsewhere, maybe even in the pages of the aforementioned
‘Shout’.
There is little shortage of source material when it comes to
The Beatles with the result that it is possible to provide a detailed account
of them without the tedious task of actually doing the leg work and interviews
yourself.
It would be wrong to suggest that this is what Norman did,
but as an example his account of Lennon’s first marriage to Cynthia looked to
be simply lifted from each of her two autobiographies, the second of which provided
an altogether harsher assessment of her marriage.
The weakness in this book comes when there is less easily
accessible information on Lennon’s life, in particular the later years of his,
tragically short life, in New York. This was a period in his life that I was
looking forward to reading about but felt disappointed with the scarcity of
information after such a detailed account of the years prior.
Despite the misgivings above this is an essential addition
to any Beatles fans’ library. It explores all facets of John’s personality, the
good and the bad. He was in many ways a man of contradictions. Aren’t we all too
some degree?
This book doesn’t gloss over his flaws. It shows John as a man
of great talent and intellect but also impaired by his own insecurities. A man
prone to acts of cruelty, yet also a man capable of displaying a generous
heart.
In short, the success of this book is in its’ portrayal of John
Lennon the man and not merely John Lennon the Beatle.
No comments:
Post a Comment